my channels
business · cars · dieting · diy · dogs · etiquette · fitness · frugal living · green living · health · home business · home improvement · jobs · parenting · self help · travel
more

history, politics, peace, firearms, bill clinton, gun violence, violence, brady bill, ronald reagan,
history
politics
peace
more...

How to reduce gun violence in the United States


RELATED ARTICLES
SECEDE! The 10th Amendment and the growing secession movement in the United Stat...
The 44th President of the United States
The history of Flag Day in the United States

The Brady Bill

To control gun violence, gun supporters believe there is a problem with gun violence in the United States of America. Compared with other nations with stronger gun management actions in Australia, Great Britain and Japan. These Nations have less death due to firearms than the United States. In 1994, The Brady Bill was implemented due to the fact that White House press secretary James Brady was seriously wounded in an attempt to assassinate the United States President, Ronald Reagan in 1981 by John Hinckley Jr. The Brady Bill instituted methods to prevent gun violence with a background check and waiting period before a gun can be obtained. To further prevent gun violence the United States of America should look at other nation laws and procedures to prevent further tragedy.

Is the Brady Bill a Solution to Gun Violence?

The use of a Gun During a Robbery between 1994 to 1998 fell by 33.7% from 257,483 to 170,611 since the Brady Bill took place. This also reduced the homicide rate by 29% in 1994. Despite these reductions, the fact is that thirty two states were bound to this law while 18 states were not. The NRA states that the 18 states that didn’t have the Brady Bill had a 16.4 decrease while the 32 states had only a 9% decrease.

Alternative Solution

An alternative to the Brady Bill was the gun buyback programs that were first implemented by Australia and Great Britain. President Bill Clinton in 1999 planned a $15 million agenda to reduce the number of guns that were in and around housing projects. 50.00 were given to each person that turned their gun into their local police station. Between 1999-2000 20,000 guns were turned in. But Bill Clinton’s program was terminated by George W. Bush in 2001.

Conclusion

All though the Brady Bill was effect, I think that the gun buyback program was more successful. What is your opinion with this. My opinion is gun is used to protect but they don’t need guns that are called cop killers or machine guns that can kill many people. This has to be restricted to the military and the police .


ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Ray
Internet Marketing

MY STATISTICS
Level : Fz Contributor  [?]
8 Factoids published
9 followers & subscribers
+ 8 positive votes
MY EXPERT RANKINGS
#1 in marital arts
#6 in martial arts
#1 in gun violence
ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
3 comments
Published 13 months ago
+ 1 positive votes
SHARE THIS ARTICLE



NEW ARTICLE ALERTS
Sign up for notifications when new knowledge articles are published in topics relating to this article:
 history
 politics
 peace
 firearms
 bill clinton
 gun violence
 violence
 brady bill
Email address:

Get published. Earn money. Gain Web cred.
Apply for a writer's account on Factoidz.

Related Articles
Comparing quality of life between United States and Europe

How taxes work in the United Kingdom: it gives, and takes away

Does California have an answer to its gang violence problem?

Removing rust from your gun without damaging its finish

Introduction to the NHS: Healthcare in the United Kingdom (England)

Etymology of the Biblical God vs. the Qur'an's Allah

Caviar: Affordable Entertaining

Republish this article [?]
You may republish this article with proper attribution to the author and Factoidz.
Click to highlight the text, then press Control+C to copy to your clipboard
Popular in History
Historical facts about the Great Depression

The National Day of Prayer Ignored: The National Day of Prayer for the Muslim religion to Go On

How to be a prepare to be a Movie Critic; and your responsibility to filmgoers

Raw Honey: Good For What Ails You Inside and Out - Far Superior to White Sugar

Where Did the English Language Originate From?

Amazing Natural and Man-Made Caves: Part 1

View more History articles
Popular in Politics
The National Day of Prayer Ignored: The National Day of Prayer for the Muslim religion to Go On

Why are health insurance costs so high?

For Some People Political Scandals are a Joke

How to detect bias on the internet

Famous predictions that never came true

Introduction to the NHS: Healthcare in the United Kingdom (England)

View more Politics articles
More Related
The Symbolism of the Pentangle in "Sir Gawin and the Green Knight"

Emerald Gemstone Crystals

National Donut Day

II. Pan-Indianism, next step of The "Peaceful Hostility" Incorporated by Manifest Destiny (academic written discourse)

I. The "Peaceful Hostility" Incorporated by Manifest Destiny (academic written discourse)

Comments & Questions
Jerry Walch  Site Editor - 306 Factoids | + 884 votes

I'll state upfront that I am a NRA member and have been ever since I turned sixteen and received my first big game hunting license. I received my first real gun, a lever action .22 rifle when I was fourteen and have been an avid gun collector ever since. No one will take away mu guns or my right to bear arms except over my dead body. On the other hand, I respect everyone's right to freely voice their opinion. That too is guaranteed by the constitution. With that said, I'm ready to comment on your article. I think that every one is missing the point here. Guns don't kill people. People kill people. Take away all the guns and those set on doing someone grave bodily harm will find another instrument to do it with. Besides that, criminals don't care if an automatic weapon i.e. machine gun, is illegal or not, if they want one they will get one. "Cop Killers", I love that one. Any gun loaded with a teflon or armor piercing round can be called a cop killer. Has anyone really stopped to think that maybe, just maybe the reason that death by firearms is so high in this country is because criminals have guns but the law abiding citizens can't get them because of the laws controling them? Criminals will always have guns and all the gun laws are doing is making the honest citizen a sitting duck for the criminal to prey on.
posted 8 months ago
Ray  Fz Contributor - 8 Factoids | + 8 votes

I respect your opinion,Jerry. You made some good points on the other side. Sure Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. I agree 100%. But on the other hand, Would you like children walking down the street with a machine gun like what they teach in african nations. Good movie to watch on this is, Blood Diamond with Leonardio Caprino. But you have a great point with Criminals having more guns on street than citizens. Hard situation to deal with. On a the economy: Bail out Banks, No, Bail out People, Yes. Why don't they give people the money instead of the banks. Why because stockbrokers and big business is running the show, the reason: Money! If you want to create your own membership website, I am giving away Free Membership Software. Let me know, Take care, slimshady22248202
posted 8 months ago
Nikkia Nicholson  Fz Contributor - 2 Factoids | + 26 votes

Good article. Please check out this article and tell me what you think. Thanks. http://factoidz.com/its-time-for-parents-to-start-parenting-again/
posted 3 weeks ago
Leave comment
You can sign in to comment under your Factoidz account.

Your name:

Email address:

Homepage (optional):

Comment:

Notify me of new comments